Recruit or Retrain? Closing the Skills Gap Strategically
In today’s evolving business landscape, the skills gap—the difference between the skills employees possess and the ones employers need—has emerged as one of the most pressing workforce challenges globally.
With rapid advancements in technology, new business models, and shifting workforce demographics, the skills gap has become a critical hurdle for organizations striving to remain competitive.
Employers are left with two primary strategies: recruiting new talent with the right skills or retraining their current workforce to meet changing demands. But which option offers the most value, and how can businesses implement these strategies effectively?
Let’s dive deeper into these strategies, assess their benefits and limitations, and explore actionable insights.
The Skills Gap Crisis: A Complex Problem
According to the World Economic Forum, over 85 million jobs globally could be displaced by shifts in the division of labour between humans and machines by 2025. At the same time, 97 million new roles may emerge that are more suited to the new division of labour. This juxtaposition of displacement and emergence underscores the complexity of the skills gap.
Industries experiencing rapid transformation—such as IT, healthcare, and manufacturing—are often at the forefront of this challenge. This shift isn’t just about new technologies like artificial intelligence (AI) or blockchain but includes soft skills such as adaptability, critical thinking, and communication.
As businesses scramble to respond, the dilemma becomes more pronounced: should they recruit new employees with the required skills or retrain the existing workforce?
Recommended reading: The Future of Work in Nigeria’s New Minimum Wage Economy
Recruiting New Talent: A Double-Edged Sword
Recruiting new talent often seems like the quickest solution to close the skills gap. The idea is straightforward—find candidates who already possess the capabilities your organization needs. However, while it might appear to be an easy fix, this strategy comes with hidden complexities and risks:
- Short-term impact vs. long-term vision: Recruiting new talent may address immediate needs, but it doesn’t always align with a company’s long-term strategy. A singular focus on recruiting can be reactive, addressing current gaps without building resilience for future changes.
- Increased competition: As companies in all sectors rush to fill the same skill gaps, the competition for talent intensifies. For highly sought-after skills like data science, cybersecurity, or digital marketing, the competition can result in higher salaries and perks that many businesses may struggle to sustain.
- Onboarding time and cultural fit: Even if you hire a candidate with the right skills, the onboarding process and time to reach full productivity can be substantial. Additionally, integrating new employees into the company culture can be challenging, with potential risks of misalignment, leading to high turnover rates.
- Talent pool limitations: In some specialized fields, the available talent pool may be insufficient, forcing organizations to either settle for suboptimal hires or revisit their retraining strategies.
Retraining: Investing in Your Workforce for the Long Haul
On the other hand, retraining focuses on upskilling existing employees, allowing companies to bridge the skills gap by leveraging their current workforce. Retraining offers several long-term advantages:
- Cost-effectiveness: While retraining requires upfront investment, it’s often more cost-effective in the long term than continuously recruiting new talent. The costs associated with recruiting—such as advertising, interviewing, onboarding, and potential turnover—can be significantly higher than developing current employees.
- Increased employee engagement and retention: Employees offered opportunities for professional growth through retraining tend to feel more valued, fostering loyalty and engagement. Gallup research shows that companies with high employee engagement are 23% more profitable than their disengaged counterparts. Investing in employee development enhances retention and reduces turnover, thereby cutting recruitment costs over time.
- Business Continuity and Agility: Retraining fosters organizational agility. Employees who are familiar with your company’s operations, culture, and values can more readily adapt to new roles or emerging technologies. They can ensure business continuity without the learning curve that comes with onboarding external hires.
Recommended reading: Outsourcing as a Strategic Response to Nigeria’s New Minimum Wage Reality
Should Companies Choose One Strategy Over the Other?
While both recruiting and retraining have their merits, the most effective solution often lies in a hybrid approach that balances the two. Here’s how companies can develop a holistic strategy:
- Perform a skills gap analysis: Conducting a thorough skills audit of your current workforce will allow you to map out existing gaps and identify which roles can be filled by retraining versus those that may require external recruitment.
- Segmentation of roles: Some roles may be better suited for recruitment, especially if they require highly specialized or technical skills. In contrast, other roles, especially those involving leadership, project management, or client-facing tasks, may benefit from retraining internal candidates with an existing understanding of your business model.
- Embrace cross-training and job rotation: Cross-training and job rotation programs allow employees to gain exposure to different functions within the organization, helping them develop diverse skill sets. This not only reduces dependence on hiring external talent but also ensures operational flexibility during times of transition.
- Leverage AI and data analytics for retraining: Using AI and data analytics, companies can now predict future skill needs and tailor their retraining programs accordingly. Technologies like machine learning and predictive analytics enable organizations to identify emerging trends and offer targeted learning pathways to employees.
Innovative Approaches to Retraining
Organizations that are committed to long-term success should consider new, innovative learning methods:
- Microlearning and just-in-t training: Instead of overwhelming employees with traditional classroom training, companies can use microlearning—delivering small, digestible pieces of information via digital platforms. This allows employees to learn on the go and immediately apply the knowledge to their daily tasks.
- Mentorship and coaching: Formalizing mentorship programs allows experienced employees to pass on their knowledge to less-experienced team members. This transfer of tacit knowledge is invaluable and fosters collaboration and knowledge-sharing within the organization.
- Corporate university programs: Some forward-thinking companies are creating in-house training academies or partnering with universities to provide tailored programs. For example, AT&T’s Future Ready initiative offers training to its employees to adapt to digital transformations in the telecom industry.
Recommended reading: AI in L&D: Transforming Corporate Learning for the Future
A Strategic Blend of Recruitment and Retraining
The decision to recruit or retrain is not an either-or proposition; rather, it should be guided by strategic goals and long-term workforce planning. In the short term, recruitment may provide an immediate solution to filling urgent gaps, but retraining offers a more sustainable, cost-effective, and engagement-boosting approach to closing the skills gap.
Ultimately, the most successful companies will adopt a blended approach, creating a talent ecosystem that combines external hiring with internal development. With the right balance, organizations can build a resilient workforce capable of adapting to future challenges, ensuring that they not only survive but thrive in a fast-changing business landscape.
By embracing innovative retraining methods, leveraging technology, and focusing on long-term growth, businesses can future-proof their workforce while maintaining a competitive edge in an increasingly complex global marketplace.